Mahdi v. Bagley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Abdullah Sharif Kaazim Mahdi (f/k/a Vernon Smith) appeals the district court’s denial of his habe-as corpus petition. Mahdi argues that the district court erred in finding that: (1) his trial counsel was not ineffective; (2) his appellate counsel was not ineffective; and (3) the retroactive application of a change in Ohio case law did not constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s denial of Mahdi’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
I
The Supreme Court of Ohio…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Keith Smith v. Noah NagyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Joshua Tackett v. Tony TrierweilerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Kareem Jackson v. Margaret BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Goff v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Michael Scott v. Marc HoukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.