Legal Opinion

Mahdi v. Bagley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2008No. 05-3471PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-appellant Abdullah Sharif Kaazim Mahdi (f/k/a Vernon Smith) appeals the district court’s denial of his habe-as corpus petition. Mahdi argues that the district court erred in finding that: (1) his trial counsel was not ineffective; (2) his appellate counsel was not ineffective; and (3) the retroactive application of a change in Ohio case law did not constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s denial of Mahdi’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

I

The Supreme Court of Ohio…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Keith Smith v. Noah NagyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Joshua Tackett v. Tony TrierweilerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Kareem Jackson v. Margaret BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Goff v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Michael Scott v. Marc HoukCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API