Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Strickland

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1991No. 4-90-0257Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE McCULLOUGH,

specially concurring:

The majority states that when the trial court has not complied with the requirements of Rule 605, a defendant is not barred from appealing the sentence in question. For that reason, the majority allows the defendant to challenge the propriety of the final order entered November 2, 1989. The defendant filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s order of March 16, 1990, not the order of November 2, 1989. She cannot challenge the order of November 2, 1989, unless either the provisions of Rule 606(c) (134 Ill. 2d R. 606(c)) are complied with by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. CovingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. K. M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. People v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API