Rush v. Green
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Rice, J., Sumter, February, 1915. Action by Ellen Rush against D. M. Green. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. cite: 99 S. C. 64; 31 S. C. 276; 61 S. C. 579. cite: 54 S. C. 191; 92 S. C. 501; 90 S. C. 494.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This action was instituted originally for the purpose of setting aside a deed, executed to the defendant by plaintiff on February 12, 1907, on the ground that it was obtained from plaintiff by defendant by a fraudulent representation that she was signing an agreement, which was also to be signed by her Husband, whereby she promised to pay the debts of her former husband from time to time as they could spare the money, and that it was not in any manner to affect any of plaintiff’s property. Later on, by leave first had and obtained,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leland v. MorrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Brown v. Bank of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Hamilton v. HamerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Williams v. McManusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mason v. FinleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Stackhouse v. ConerlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918