Texas Compensation Insurance Co. v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBateman, Justice
With due deference, I wish to record my dissent. I thought we went as far as we could reasonably be expected to go in extending the “access doctrine” as an exception to the “going and coming rule” in Kelty v. Travelers Insurance Company, 391 S.W.2d 558 (Tex.Civ.App. — Dallas 1965, writ ref’d n. r. e.). But now the majority has gone a step further in holding that an employee, simply because of a barricade blocking the sidewalk and the signs directing pedestrians to cross the street, sustained a compensable injury when she fell in a public street on her way to work.
Until the legislature sees…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Kelty v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.