Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Bernard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1971No. 28 June Term 1971, Docket No. 52,748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. E. Brennan, J.

This malpractice action was tried to a jury in circuit court. Judgment for defendants was entered upon a verdict of no cause for action. After denial of motion for new trial and appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed. 21 Mich App 260.

Of the several assignments of error, only one will be considered. It warrants reversal and remand for new trial.

Supporting her motion for new trial, plaintiff filed the following affidavit:

“Doreen Fisher, while under oath, deposes and says as follows:
“1. That subsequent to the trial of the above-captioned matter, she was approached by one of the jurors, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fisher v. BernardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Poet v. Traverse City Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Poet v. Traverse City Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Szopko v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Szopko v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API