Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Singh

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 17, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01437Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01437 JLT HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 13 v. GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, 14 JASWANT SINGH, individually and dba DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW GRANT MARKET and RAJINDER CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND 15 KAUR, individually and dba GRANT DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO MARKET, CLOSE THE CASE 16 Defendants. (Docs. 10, 12) 17 18 Jose Acosta default judgment against the defendants—Jaswant Singh, individually…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API