Legal Opinion

White v. North

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 14, 1999No. 85, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATHELL, Judge.

Petitioners Anne and Richard White seek the reinstatement of a decision by the Anne Arundel County Board of Appeals (Board) granting their request for a zoning variance to construct an in-ground concrete swimming pool in the sloped back yard of their home. On judicial review, the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County reversed the Board, ruling its decision was “arbitrary and capricious.” The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the circuit court. 1

Petitioners present three questions for our review:

1. Did the Decision of the Court of Special Appeals effectively render meaningless…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Mayor of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. BELVOIR FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. INC. v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Agneslane, Inc. v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. People's Counsel v. SurinaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Stansbury v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Alviani v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Mastandrea v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API