Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Do

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 25, 2022No. 6:22-cv-01186Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS AUSTIN LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-1186-JWB NGYUEN DO, doing business as Innuendo, Defendant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Garnishee. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for judgment (Doc. 10) and Garnishee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s motion for leave to amend its garnishment answer. (Doc. 8.) The motions are sufficiently briefed and the time for filing further briefs has expired, making the motions ripe for decision. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s motion for judgment is DENIED…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Jewell v. SchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API