Legal Opinion

Ex Parte James Harnage

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 11, 2009No. 10-08-00415-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-08-00415-CR

Ex parte James Harnage

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 07-071-CR

ABATEMENT ORDER

James Harnage filed a pretrial habeas application and motion to dismiss his capital murder prosecution because of delay in excess of that permitted by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. Following a hearing, the court orally announced its decision to deny Harnage’s habeas application and motion to dismiss. Harnage filed a notice of appeal, but the trial court has not signed a written order.

The time to perfect an appeal in such a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API