Legal Opinion · Dissent

Golden v. Michigan Miller's Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 29, 1996Published

1Dissent

Goldstein, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse the judgment, on the law, to grant the application, and to confirm the arbitration award, with the following memorandum: The appellant argues that “[fjailure to timely move to stay the arbitration pursuant to CPLR 7503” precludes the insurance carrier from arguing that there was no agreement to arbitrate pursuant to the terms of the policy. That is not an accurate description of the law. Where there is no agreement to arbitrate, the 20-day Statute of Limitations for moving for a stay of arbitration is inapplicable (see, Matter of Matarasso…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. LegrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Thelco Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Brooke Bond India, Ltd. v. Gel Spice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API