Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Mills

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2006No. S-02-1085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

INTRODUCTION

Stuart B. Mills asks this court to reinstate him to the practice of law following a 2-year suspension. The Counsel for Discipline resists the application for reinstatement because, subsequent to this court’s suspension order, Mills pleaded guilty in federal court to a felony charge based upon the same conduct for which he was disciplined.

FACTS

Mills was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Nebraska on January 22, 1973. On December 5, 2003, this court suspended Mills from the practice of law for 2 years as a result of his engaging in conduct which violated the Code of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. ButterfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. EricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. TremblyNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. TremblyNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API