Holman v. State

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Keith Holman appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. In his motion, Holman contended that the trial court erred in denying him credit from his sentence for the time he spent on probation. A Rule 24.035 motion is inappropriate for the relief Holman seeks, therefore, the decision of the motion court is upheld.

On April 27, 1982, Holman pled guilty to one count of stealing in excess of $150. The circuit court suspended imposition of his sentence and placed him on probation for a period of four years. On…