Legal Opinion
Banks v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 19, 1990No. 23125-1-IPublished
1Opinion of the Court
57 Wn. App. 251 (1990)
787 P.2d 953
LISA BANKS, Appellant,
v.
NORDSTROM, INC., ET AL, Respondents.
No. 23125-1-I.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.
March 19, 1990.
Joseph Chalverus, for appellant.
Suzanne Kelly Michael and Lane Powell Moss & Miller, for respondents.
RINGOLD, J.[*]
The plaintiff Lisa Banks appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her complaint against defendants Nordstrom, Inc., and several Nordstrom's employees (referred to collectively as Nordstrom). Finding that material factual issues remain regarding her claim for malicious prosecution, we reverse.
On December 26,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.