Legal Opinion

Beiswenger v. Cerasoli

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 30, 1958Published

1Per curiam

The new lease to Bronx Tyros Social & Athletic Club, Inc., by landlord appellant with the consent of tenant respondent for the balance of the unexpired term of the lease did not destroy the relationship of landlord and tenant between landlord appellant and tenant respondent, since the intent of the parties as manifested in the letter of December 21, 1955 was to maintain that relationship for the unexpired term of the lease, notwithstanding the execution of the new lease to Bronx Tyros Social & Athletic Club, Inc. (See Brill v. Friedhoff, 184 App. Div. 673, affd. 229 N. Y. 547.)

The final order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brill v. . FriedhoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Brill v. FriedhoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API