Legal Opinion

Schildkraut v. Paino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1933Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. There is no decision; therefore, the judgment herein in its present form may not be sustained. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 440 and 441; Nelson v. Ryan, 222 App. Div. 754; Samuel v. Bastress, 231 id. 867; appeal dismissed, 256 N. Y. 667.) The plaintiff presented a prima facie case for an accounting if certain of the oral testimony were credited in connection with the documentary proof. The scope of his proof as a basis for an accounting was unduly restricted by the rulings of the trial court. There should be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API