Modern Dust Bag Co. v. Commercial Trust Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Bramhall, Vice Chancellor:
Upon petition to this court by plaintiff a rule was issued upon the defendant to show cause why this court should not issue an order upon defendant to deliver to plaintiff certain warehouse receipts held by defendant upon payment into court by the plaintiff of such sum as the court might fix as security for the payment of defendant’s claim against the plaintiff, in the event that the defendant should prevail in this action.
The warehouse receipts represent certain paper belonging to plaintiff, of a special kind and quality required by the plaintiff in the conduct of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Price, Et Vir v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Briscoe v. O'ConnorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Modern Dust Bag Co. v. Commercial Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952