Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Weaver

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 1990No. 89-418PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs in the original case are subscribers for health care benefits with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama ("Blue Cross"). They brought a class action seeking a declaratory judgment and an order directing refunds of excess reserves alleged to be held by Blue Cross. The plaintiffs claimed that Blue Cross had "accumulated an illegal and/or excessive profit and/or reserve and surplus in excess of the amount allowed by statute in Alabama, or required for the solvency of the plan" and that Blue Cross's board of directors was not a representative cross-section of the population, as is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stein v. HowlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. CoferTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Chapman v. GoodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Barber v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. State v. the American Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API