Legal Opinion
Paglia v. Agrawal
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1987PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from, denying a motion to vacate a prior dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3404, does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (Le Frois Foods Corp. v Aetna Ins. Co., 74 AD2d 730, mots to dismiss appeal granted 49 NY2d 1043; Til v O’Brien, 53 AD2d 1030, appeal dismissed 40 NY2d 902; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 36 [b], at 143-144).
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Aetna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Til v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by16 opinions
- Angelucci v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Borrelli v. MayeNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Bray v. Thor Steel & Welding Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Christiano v. SOLOVIEFF REALTY CO., LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Christiano v. Solovieff Realty Co., L.L.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.