Legal Opinion

State v. Scharlepp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 31, 2018No. 1D18-1511Published

1Per curiam

The state seeks a writ of prohibition disqualifying the trial judge in a pending criminal matter. We agree that in denying the state's second motion to disqualify, the trial judge attempted to refute the charges of partiality. This created an independent basis for disqualification. See Bundy v. Rudd , 366 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla. 1978) ("When a judge has looked beyond the mere legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and has attempted to refute the charges of partiality, he has then exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone established grounds for his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bundy v. RuddSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Lee Memorial Health v. Agency for HealthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API