Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Hilton & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles A. Loreto, J.

Claimant, as a passenger in one motor vehicle, sustained personal injuries in a head-on collision with another motor vehicle. Pursuant to article 17-A of the New York Insurance Law, he filed a claim with the MVAIC. In turn, it obtained an order of this court directing ‘ ‘ a trial of the preliminary issue as to whether claimant was an ‘ innocent victim ’ within the meaning of Article 17-A ’ ’ of the statute.

The respondent contends the claimant was not an innocent victim. It relies principally on testimony given by a State Trooper who interviewed claimant in a hospital shortly after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Short & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & JermanNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Nagle & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. In re the Arbitration between Merchants Mutual Insurance & AnzianoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Aetna Life & Casualty, PFSD v. CliffordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API