Brachvogel v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2001, upon consideration of defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs response in opposition, and defendants’ reply brief, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 13) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court’s order is based on the following reasoning:
Plaintiff alleges that, following her complaints of sexual harassment, defendants retaliated against her by dismissing her from her job as a sales manager, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Robert D. Shaner, Jr. v. Synthes (Usa)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Allegheny Housing Rehabilitation Corp. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Preobrazhenskaya v. Mercy Hall InfirmaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003