H. Keith Zahn v. International Paper Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentTimbers, Circuit Judge
(dissenting) :
With deference, it seems to me that the majority reads the Supreme Court’s decision in Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332 (1969), for all it might be worth, rather than for the least it has to be worth. More significantly, the majority decision here ignores the well-established principle that if a case is properly in a federal court, that court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case or controversy in its entirety and therefore can adjudicate related claims of ancillary parties who have no independent jurisdictional grounds.
I
The concept of “ancillary jurisdiction” has been a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.