Legal Opinion · Dissent

F. Gregorie & Son v. Hamlin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1979No. 21009Published

1Dissent

*434Ness, Justice

(dissenting) :

Concluding that a genuine issue of material fact exists, I would reverse and remand for the taking of testimony.

Respondents Gregorie, et al. brought this action tO' declare a 1961 deed from the late Ferdinand Gregorie, Sr. to appellant Hamlin a mortgage. Appellant denied the deed was intended to be a mortgage, and unequivocally stated in his deposition (Tr. 60) and in his affidavit (Tr. 197) that he “bought” the disputed property in fee simple absolute.

It is well settled that in order to convert an apparent deed into a mortgage, the proof must be clear and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thevenot ex rel. Estate of Thevenot v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Lunsford v. McDanielSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. Thomas v. BartellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API