Legal Opinion · Dissent

People Ex Rel Coe v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1921No. L. A. No. 6525Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1DissentWilbur, J.

I dissent.

The statute under which the election was held expressly provides for the form of ballot. Ballots in this form were used at the election. Section 5 of the. act, which regulates the procedure in the event that the assumption of a portion of the bonded indebtedness of the larger city is involved, after expressly providing for the filing of a petition praying that “the property in such municipal corporations, shall after such consolidation, be subject to taxation at the same rate, to pay any of such bonded indebtedness specified in said petition; ...” then provides, as stated in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haskell v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API