Legal Opinion

Matador Land & Cattle Co. v. Cassidy-Southwestern Commission Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 8922PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Baylor County; J. H. Milam, Judge. Action by the Matador Land & Cattle Company, Limited, against the Cassidy-Southwestern Commission Company, and another. From the judgment rendered, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

It is agreed in this case that appellant, plaintiff below, is the owner of survey No. 96, hereinafter described, and that the appellee, Cassidy-Southwestern Commission Company, is the owner of survey No. I, originally patented to T. H. Harkey, situated immediately west of said section 96, and that the only issue involved in this case is as to the true boundary line between said survey No. 96 and said survey No. 1.

The boundary line between the surveys named, as fixed by the judgment of the court below, is 101.2 varas east of where appellant claims that it should be. In the effort to make clear…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stafford v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. FennerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Linney v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Jones v. BurgettTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Lilly v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Standefer v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Leone Plantation, Inc. v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Ross v. Houston Oil Fields Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Strong v. Delhi-Taylor Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API