Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Western

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1930No. 40333Published

1DissentKindig, J.

(dissenting). — I am unable to agree with the majority’s construction of and conclusion with reference to the dis trict court’s instructions known in the opinion as Nos. 4 and 5. Those instructions, so far as material, are:

“You are instructed that, before the defendant can be convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following essentials :
“1. That the defendant made an assault upon Madge Jones, a female child under the age of 16 years.

‘ ‘ 2. That such assault was made by him with the intent to have or attempt to have [the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. WerblowNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Gustine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. Miller v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. ThomasonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. People v. PetrosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API