Legal Opinion

Diaz v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2013No. DA 12-0432PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Class representatives Jeanette Diaz and Leah HoffmannBernhardt appeal a class certification order entered by the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, arguing that the court imposed arbitrary and unreasonable limits when defining the class. The class complaint alleged that the State, as well as third-party administrators of the State group health insurance plan, violated the insureds’ statutory made-whole rights by exercising their subrogation interests without first conducting made-whole analyses of the insureds. The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Hawkins v. Comparet-CassaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Richard B. Sagers v. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union No. 728Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Chipman v. Northwest Healthcare Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Worledge v. Riverstone Residential Group, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Rolan v. New West Health ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Morrow v. Monfric, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Byorth v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Vulles v. Thies & TalleMontana Supreme Court · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API