Legal Opinion

State v. Ladmer

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 5, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNCAN, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, William Ladmer, pled guilty to use of a minor for obscene purposes. He received a Range I sentence of three (3) years in the Department of Correction, to be served in the local workhouse. The defendant reserved, pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(i) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure, the right to appeal a certified question of law.

The certified question, as stated in the trial judge’s order, is:

Whether or not the fact that the female victim who was sixteen (16) years old was married and had a child was sufficient to legally constitute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austin v. Memphis Publishing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sanderlin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1841
  3. Elkins v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RobinetteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API