Legal Opinion

Brook, Oliphant & Co. v. Vannest

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*163The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This is an action to recover the amount due upon the following promissory note:

Trenton, N. J., Jany. 30, 1891.

“ Pour months after date we promise to pay to the order of ourselves forty-nine hundred and eighty-six dollars at the office of ¥m. B. Brook & Co., at No. 40 John Street, New York City, value received.
“Brook, Oliphant & Co.”

Endorsed—“Brook, Oliphant & Co. For discount and credit of the Central Rubber Selling Co.

“ John H. Britton, Treas.”

This note was executed by Brook, one of the firm of Brook, Oliphant & Company, in favor of the.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Palmetto BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. United States v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API