Legal Opinion

State Office of Risk Management v. Carty

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2014No. 13-0639PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lehrmann

When a workers’ compensation beneficiary recovers from a third party for injuries compensable under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), the insurance carrier is entitled to be reimbursed from that recovery for benefits paid to the beneficiary and to treat any excess proceeds as an advance against future benefits owed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has certified the following three questions regarding the carrier’s right to excess proceeds recovered by multiple beneficiaries:

1. In a case involving a recovery by multiple beneficiaries, how should the excess net…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Roberts v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. in Re the Office of the Attorney GeneralTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. LedbetterTexas Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ralph S. Janvey, in His Capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver for the Stanford International Bank, Limited Official Stanford Investors Committee v. the Golf Channel, Incorporated Tgc, L.L.C., Doing Business as Golf ChannelTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In re WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. City of El Paso v. VielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Centerpoint Builders Gp, LLC and Centerpoint Builders, Ltd. v. Trussway, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. WedelTexas Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API