Legal Opinion

Finance Co. v. Gamperling

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided December 2, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtEastman, J.

The petition alleges that the plaintiff is an Ohio corporation, duly organized and doing business under the loan laws of the state of Ohio.

For the first cause of action it is claimed that there is due from Albert M. and Eva A. Gamperling the sum of $105 with 8 per cent, interest from December 7, 1924, as the balance due on a promissory note. A copy of a note dated December 7, 1923, for $250 due one year from date, payable to the order of the Wintner Plan Finance Company at its offices in Cleveland, Ohio, to be paid in weekly installments of $5 for fifty weeks, commencing seven days after date…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lassman v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. In re FishelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API