Legal Opinion

Kinnear-Weed Corporation v. Humble Oil & Refining Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1959No. 16780Published

1Per curiam

We did not intend to read into the claims of appellant’s patent, as limitations of that patent, any part of the drawings or of the specifications not expressed or necessarily referred to by implication in those claims. In our opinion, the claims themselves of the reissue patent are limited to a combination rotary drilling tool, bit, or drill, and the patent has not been infringed by the appellee. We correct clerical errors in a sentence in the next to the concluding paragraph of the opinion reading, “We agree with the district court that the appellant has not infringed appellee’s patent” [259…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robert L. Fuller v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API