Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Baltimore & O. R.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 3, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, District Judge.
On December 20, 1917, the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company filed with the Alien Property Custodian a report, pursuant to the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act (40 Stat. 411 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115%a et seq.]), wherein.it report-, ed that certain named persons, including the Deutsche Bank, believed to be enemies, were the registered owners of certain shares of its' capital stock, and that the actual location of the certificates representing the shares were unknown to it. Thereafter, on May 4, 1918, the Custodian made a determination…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bantel v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- McGrath v. American Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1953