Legal Opinion

Palmieri v. Antinozzi

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for ejectment, tried by the court, a jury trial having been waived.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The action is plainly the ordinary common-law action for ejectment and not, as counsel for defendants designates it; a “ summary proceeding ” to recover the possession of land, which is purely statutory. Hence, so much of counsel’s brief as aims to show that the facts do not authorize the relief asked for by the plaintiff, that summary proceedings do not lie for a mere breach of the lessee’s covenant, and that such proceedings cannot be authorized by agreement of the parties to the lease for a case not within the statute, is wholly irrelevant.

The cause of action is predicated of the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tenement House Department v. MoeschenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Post v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Allen v. JaquishNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Tenement House Department v. MoeschenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Jackson v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1796

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. HounWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API