Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Rowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 11, 1980PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The motion for summary judgment dismissing the claims for conscious pain and suffering brought by the administrator of the estates of Janet Anderson and Judy Anderson was properly granted. All of the evidence shows that these girls were killed instantly upon impact. The plaintiff was not able to present any evidence that they suffered any conscious pain. Nor was the plaintiff able to show evidence from which one might imply that the decedents were aware of the danger and suffered from preimpact terror. Summary judgment was properly…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Shu-Tao Lin v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Shatkin v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Carlson v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Nelson v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Beynon v. Montgomery Cablevision Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API