Legal Opinion

Reed v. Photo-Gravure Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 27, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from trial term. Action by Emma A. Reed against Photo-Gravure Company to recover on a promissory note in which plaintiff was payee and defendant indorser. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

On March 6,1889, in an action by Emma A. Reed against A. J. Bishop, one P. I. Clarkin was the attorney of record for plaintiff, Reed. Upon the trial of the case now under consideration the plaintiff was, against objection and exception from the defendant,Photo-Gravure Company, allowed to prove by Clarkin, her attorney in the suit against Bishop, that the time within which Bishop could answer was extended until May 9, 1889, upon receiving from him his promissory note indorsed by Photo-Gravure Company, and with the further understanding with Bishop alone that if the note was paid at maturity…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bacon v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foerster v. SquierCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API