Legal Opinion

People v. Gramo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1993No. 4—91—0851, 4—91—0861, 4—91—0862 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN

delivered the opinion of the court:

In the fall of 1990, the State charged defendant Jan Gramo, a/k/a Jan Bocian, a/k/a Stanislaw Piontek, in De Witt, Livingston, and McLean Counties with multiple counts of attempt (residential burglary), residential burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, pars. 8 — 4(a), 19 — 3), obstruction of justice (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 31 — 4(a)), theft (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 16 — l(a)(4)(A)), and possession of burglary tools (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 19 — 2). The cases from all three counties were…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. SteppanIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. ConoverIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. P.H.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. BourkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jan Bocian, Also Known as Jan Gramo v. Salvador Godinez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. People v. CatronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. People v. BowenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  4. People v. ChildsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. People v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API