Marte v. Berkman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurrence
Freedman, J. (concurring).
The original trial court was not compelled by manifest necessity to declare a mistrial and terminate the proceedings after two days of deliberations (see Matter of Randall v Rothwax, 78 NY2d 494, 498 [1991], cert denied sub nom. Morgenthau v Randall, 503 US 972 [1992]), because the court reasonably could have asked the jury to continue deliberating past 5:00 p.m. on the date the trial was terminated, a Friday. Although two of the jurors indicated that they had scheduling problems during the following week, the court had already directed them to report for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. DudaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Randall v. RothwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Guido v. BerkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986