Legal Opinion

Niebuhr v. Schreyer

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 7, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of this court denying a motion to cancel a lis pendens. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

Section 1673 of the Code of Civil Procedure gives a defendant the right to file a lis pendens when he sets up in his answer a counterclaim on which he demands an affirmative judgment, affecting the title to or the possession, use or enjoyment of real property.

The answer in this action sets up a counterclaim as follows : “ 6th. And this defendant further answering, and by way of counterclaim, alleges that at the time said joint enterprise was being carried out between the plaintiff-—-acting on behalf of said Henry P. Niebuhr and this defendant—the said plaintiff took part of the funds in which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beman v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Shostack v. HaskellNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Murray v. BarthThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API