Legal Opinion

Luster v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 11, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

The appellants, Bert Luster and Donald Smith, were given two-year sentences upon conviction of violating KRS 433.190, which prohibits the breaking of “any warehouse, storehouse, office, shop * * *, whether such place is or is. not a depository for goods, wares or merchandise, * * * with intent to steal * *

The indictment charged the breaking and entering of a “pool hall.” The ap*268pellants contend that their demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained because the statute applies only to places in which goods, wares and merchandise are usually deposited for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Drury v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  4. Bowman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  5. Conrad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartsock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. TruglioCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API