Gendreau v. Gendreau (In Re Gendreau)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Dissent
HAGAN, Bankruptcy Judge,
dissenting:
My analysis of the applicable law would mandate a reversal of the order appealed. I therefore respectfully dissent. The order stating that the Appellee had a property interest in the Debtor’s pension plan was not a Qualified Domestic Relations Order; it could not create a property interest in the pension plan; and therefore it was a debt discharged in bankruptcy.
DISCUSSION
1. The Appellee Could Not Obtain an Interest in the United Pension Plans in the Absence of a QDRO.
The majority opinion properly notes that the Order did not create a debt that was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Robert Burns Jensen Rosemary Tooker Jensen, Debtors. California Department of Health Services v. Robert Burns Jensen Rosemary Tooker JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.