Legal Opinion

State v. Moore, 14-08-43 (5-4-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2009No. 14-08-43PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Todd M. Moore, appeals the judgment of the Marysville Municipal Court denying his motion for a new trial and evidentiary hearing, sentencing him to a thirty-day jail term, imposing three years of community control, and ordering him to complete anger management counseling and pay a $600 fine. On appeal, Moore argues that the trial court erred in failing to rule on his motion for acquittal and in denying his motion for a new trial because an alleged Brady v.Maryland discovery violation occurred; that the trial court erred in finding that he waived any discovery…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. MappOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. McNealOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API