Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 11, 2000No. 17105-1-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Aidan Mathew Guzman’s jury found him guilty as an accomplice to murder in the first degree by extreme indifference, two counts of first degree assault and one count of second degree assault as the driver in a drive-by shooting. He argues on appeal that the instructions improperly summarized accomplice liability because he was not the shooter. Sentencing error is conceded under In re Post Sentencing Review of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239, 955 P.2d 798 (1998). We decide the accomplice liability instructions are proper statements of the law. We affirm and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

In May 1997, Mr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DomingoWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Spokane v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. City of Spokane v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API