Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh & B. Coal Co. v. Hudak

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 26, 1910No. 1,393Published

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Action at law by Michael Hudak, in his. own right and as father and next friend of John Hudak, a minor, against the Pittsburgh & Baltimore Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

This action was commenced in the court below by Michael Hudak, as father and next friend of his minor son, to recover damages sustained by the son by reason of an injury which he received through the alleged negligence of the defendant below while in its employ, and also for the expenses incurred by the father in the case of his son, as well as for the loss of his son’s services. John Hudak was a minor about 17 years of age, and first entered the empkyment of the defendant below as a trapper in a coal mine, and continued to serve in that capacity for about one year.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Choctaw, O. & G. R. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Donegan v. Baltimore & N. Y. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  4. Newark & South Orange Railroad v. McCannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API