Legal Opinion

Ainu'u v. Ainu'u

High Court of American Samoa

Decided August 27, 2003No. DR No. 15-03Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

Petitioner Leota Vaea Ainu'u (“Leota”) filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. Respondent Tasiaeafe Ainu'u (“Tasiaeafe”) moved, pursuant to T.C.R.C.P. 12(b)(1), to dismiss the action on the ground that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the petition. In particular, Tasiaeafe contends that Leota fails to meet the one-year residency requirement under A.S.C.A. § 42.0206(a)(1). The Court, having heard and considered counsels’ arguments, will deny the motion.

Standard of Review

In deciding a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re the Marriage of BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API