Legal Opinion

Radmila Pavlicek v. Jerabek, Inc., etc.

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 12, 1995No. 2420941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, Judge.

Incidental to an award of benefits to Radmila Pavlicek (claimant) under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), claimant’s counsel (counsel) petitioned the Workers’ Compensation Commission (commission) for attorney’s fees payable from that portion of the recovery “which benefits the ... health care providers],” pursuant to Code § 65.2-714. 1 The commission denied the relief, concluding that it did not relate to a “contested claim,” and claimant appeals. Jerabek, Inc. (employer) urges that we dismiss the appeal, contending that the health care providers were indispensable,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Iron Works, Inc. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  2. Diggs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  3. Green v. Warwick Plumbing & Heating Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. COM., DEPT. OF MINES v. May Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  5. Department of Game & Inland Fisheries v. JoyceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danville Radiologists, Inc. v. Raymond PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  2. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company v. Kathleen TefftCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  3. Pamela Larsen Stack v. Sandra F. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API