Legal Opinion

Grazi v. Douglaston Estates, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 30, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It was improper to vacate the original judgment which had been directed to stand as security when defendant’s default was opened. This judgment, except as to such portion thereof as is in excess of the amount recovered by plaintiff after *968trial, remains of record and continues unimpaired as a lien against the property of the defendant. (Mott v. Union Bank of City of N. Y., 38 N. Y. 18; Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 187 App. Div. 158; Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Ins. Co., 126 App. Div. 446; MacDougall v. Hoes, 27 Misc. 590; Ingber v. De Friesse, 109 N. Y. S. 2d 419; 7 Carmody-Wait, New…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mott v. . Union Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. MacDougall v. HoesNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gundersheim v. KurcerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lebeck v. MastromarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API