Legal Opinion

U.S.A.C. Transport, Inc. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 29, 1962No. Civ. Nos. 12323, 12844Published

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

These actions, which were consolidated for trial and were heard together by the court without a jury, arise out of a collision between a B & 0 train and a tractor-trailer unit which had “hung up” on one of the outside rails at a grade crossing because of the road’s steep approach to the tracks and the extremely low cleai-ance of the trailer, only 12 inches above the ground. The claims of the two plaintiffs (U. S. A. C. Transport and Ozmer) against the B & 0 and the B & O’s counterclaims raise questions as to the nature of the crossing, negligence, assumption of risk,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peregoy v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Carroll v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. Martin v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  4. CAMPBELL, ETC. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State Ex Rel. WelchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API