U.S.A.C. Transport, Inc. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
These actions, which were consolidated for trial and were heard together by the court without a jury, arise out of a collision between a B & 0 train and a tractor-trailer unit which had “hung up” on one of the outside rails at a grade crossing because of the road’s steep approach to the tracks and the extremely low cleai-ance of the trailer, only 12 inches above the ground. The claims of the two plaintiffs (U. S. A. C. Transport and Ozmer) against the B & 0 and the B & O’s counterclaims raise questions as to the nature of the crossing, negligence, assumption of risk,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peregoy v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Carroll v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Martin v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- CAMPBELL, ETC. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State Ex Rel. WelchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.