Mills Novelty Co. v. Spurdis

Mills Novelty Company was plaintiff below. .Nick Spurdis was the defendant. We shall refer to them as such.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover $748 alleged to be the balance due upon a note, together with interest and 15 per cent, attorney’s fees.

Defendant answered by general demurrer, some special exceptions, general denial, and by cross-action pleaded over against plaintiff alleging that the contract out of which the note in question arose was procured by false and fraudulent representations made by the agent of plaintiff to defendant, but for which defendant would not have executed the…