Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 16, May T., 1893, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., March T., 1892, No. 109, in favor of defendant on appeal from tax settlement. Appeal from tax settlement.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 16, May T., 1893, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., March T., 1892, No. 109, in favor of defendant on appeal from tax settlement. Appeal from tax settlement. The opinion of the court below was as follows, by McPherson, J.: “This case was tried without a jury under the provisions of the act of 1874. We find the facts to be as follows: “1. The defendant is a corporation of this commonwealth, chartered in July, 1882, under the general corporation act of 1874, for the purpose of “the manufacture of articles of commerce from iron and steel, and the building of bridges…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cuejam,
This case was argued with Commonwealth v. Keystone Bridge Company, No. 18, May term, 1893, [the preceding case,] and involved substantially the same questions. For reasons suggested in opinion just filed in that case, and also in the opinion of the learned trial judge, we think there is nothing in the record that requires either reversal or modification of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Filbert Paving & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Western Pipe Line Constructors, Inc. v. DickinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
- Commonwealth v. Interstate Amiesite Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- In re Rutland Realty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1907
- Electric Welding Co. v. Pittsburgh School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958